![]()
This first project was something I'd been wanting to try out for years:
to combine several pictures of the same scene, with different
focus ranges, to create a single picture with extended
depth of focus. This is common practice in ultrasound imaging.
Here the camera sat on a small garden table, with some
recently fallen leaves from a "Festival" Liquidambar
tree (so named because it produces leaves with a variety
of fall colors). About four yards behind the garden table
is a mask on the trunk of the tree, and about a dozen yards
further back sits a garage. Using Adobe Photoshop to extract
and combine the sharpest parts of six different images was
tedious, but the result demonstrates how well the technique
can work, and some of its pitfalls. One such pitfall is that
objects can end up with a halo around them from their
unfocused counterpart.
One day I would like to try automating this process. The
first part would be to have software determine automatically
what F-stop to use (based on the desired sharpness), and
how many pictures to take and to what distance each should
be focused (based on the F-stop and the desired uniformity
of sharpness). If you look closely at the leaves and the
grain of the wood in the garden table you'll see that the
near-field foci were spaced too far apart in this experiment
to get uniform
sharpness. Although this isn't easy to get right by
hand, it wouldn't be very difficult to write software to
compute the optimum settings.
Automating the combining of the pictures seems like the
hard part, but maybe the camera could help by using its
auto-focusing apparatus to record which parts of each
picture are in focus. A product called
Helicon Focus combines pictures without this information
and appears to do an excellent job.
I've used the technique of combining different
pictures of the same scene many times now, sometimes to extend
the range of focus
as here,
but it can also help in scenes
that combine very light and very dark regions that are both
rich in detail. For example, in
this photo,
the sky and the ground are from different exposures.
|
![]() ![]()
As you can see in the first picture here, in spite of the
long exposure the princess herself came out too dark.
Unfortunately, lightening the whole image resulted in
washed out walls and a less interesting shadow. So this
needed a princess-shaped mask in Photoshop. Getting the
boundary between the lightened princess and the unlightened
walls to look natural was very tricky -- the mask had to
be just the right size and shape, and to have edges that
were feathered over just the right number of pixels. I'd be
embarrassed to admit how many hours I spent on this, and
how many false starts were abandoned as I learned Photoshop.
But I really came to love this work of art, and will no doubt
revisit the V&A museum the next time I'm in London.
I often wonder if her shadow was the artist's intent, or a
lucky accident discovered by a lighting designer at the museum.
|